Using "guidelines" to deceive people is more powerful than manipulating data
It's even worse when these guidelines use "circular reasoning" as the basis for their implementation!
The guidelines used to collect data matter. They matter A LOT
It is well documented that COVID cases increase significantly within a few days following the first vaccine dose, when Delta was the dominant variant
See page 6 of the Ontario public health summary report
A person is NOT “officially” vaccinated until 14 days AFTER receiving their dose. If they catch COVID during this 14 day period, they are considered "unvaccinated"
The reasoning is that it takes 14 days to build immunity. So a person can not be truly vaccinated until they achieve full immunity. (Circular reasoning?)
The assumption is the vaccines do not negatively impact people during this period
The 14 day period is critical in its implications, especially when it comes to reporting deaths
Let's put 2 and 2 together:
A person is more likely to catch COVID after getting vaccinated, but is not officially vaccinated until 14 days later.
So if they get infected with COVID during this period and die (whether before or after the 14 day period), they officially died from COVID... AND their status will be UNVACCINATED.
Let's be abundantly clear: the vaccine CAUSED them to catch COVID, and whether they died from COVID or not is irrelevant after that. The official report will indicate they died from COVID and were UNVACCINATED.
The fact that they were unvaccinated is categorically false!
The fact they died from COVID, may be true, however there is also a good possibility they died from another adverse reaction to the vaccine, but we will never know... because they definitely died with COVID, which for all intents and purposes is the same as dying from COVID. (In a sane world these cases are very different!)
Hypothesis
For a time, I wondered if the vaccines induced COVID likes symptoms and caused a positive test for some people.
Dr. Monica Hughes addressed this in one of her recent articles, which indicates this may not to be the case.
So what other explanations are there for people to be infected with COVID within a few days of receiving their first dose?
Could it be explained by a large number of "asymptomatic" people in the population?
i.e. Healthy people that were infected with a small amount of virus, which their immune system was able to handle easily.
However, the vaccines reacted with their bodies in such a way, that it overwhelmed their immune system and allowed the virus to take the upper hand rapidly?
If this hypothesis turns out to be true, wouldn’t it prove that COVID was really not a serious threat to most people? and that the vaccines only made matters worse?
Isn’t it scary how something that is causing a lot of harm can be “sold” to the public as something good?
Could a similar mechanism also explain why Omicron spread so rapidly after people took their booster shot?
(The speed with which Omicron spread throughout the world is truly puzzling...)
Notes
Prof. Didier Raoult's observations were mainly for the Delta variant when people received their first dose.
Would it be different for Omicron?
Prof. Didier Raoult has data that shows people are more likely to catch Omicron after their 3rd (booster) dose, but this happens a few weeks after their shot. Unlike the case with Delta, which really happened within the first few days.
The reasoning to ignore the 14 day period after injection because a person does not have full immunity is so deceptively convincing! Most people are willing to accept this proposition without questioning. (Which turns out to be fatal).
Summary
Regardless of the explanations the reality is, we have been duped. Wool has been pulled over our eyes!
The nuance her is that the data has NOT been manipulated per say.
The GUIDELINES have been designed in such a way to hide the truth contained in the data. That is the crux. And the implications are worse. Far worse.
Please feel free to share. People need to know the truth: The guidelines were designed to purposely deceive people, and make them believe the vaccines are safer and more effective than they really are. People have been lied to!
The more people understand how guidelines can be used to engineer a certain outcome the less effective these methods will be in the future.
Question
How many people "officially" died “from” COVID after receiving their first dose but were categorized as unvaccinated?
Links and References
All this came together while listening to and interview by Tommy's podcast with Dr Jessica Rose and Mathew Crawford
Dr. Monica Hughes article "2000 Extra All-Cause Deaths Associated with New Zealand's Covid Vaccine Rollout"
Prof. Didier Raoult's video :
Watch from 17: 40 onwards. Look at the blue portion of the graph.
This falls under the umbrella of what I like to call Enron accounting where the numbers used for evaluation have footnotes that apply definitions that change the entire formula. On contract pricing it takes the form of revising billable items so evaluation includes routine costs like maintenance in residual value just by moving the category the cost is recorded. This is how we end up with $900 hammers etc.. Enron accounting is lucrative even when they get caught.
These are highly prized skills in the world of lobbyists legislation and Federal contracts. These loopholes and distorted reporting are government wide and underlie system wide corruption, nice illustration tyvm.
I’m not so certain that Dr. Hughes’ post actually disproves the initial hypothesis. One would have to have more detail about the diagnosis practices in New Zealand, and more detail re: testing methods and distribution, especially following jab, in order to make that assessment.
I don’t know much about cycle threshold for PCR used in New Zealand, or if they (like the CDC recommended in the US) failed to test jabbed and unjabbed populations with the same CT. Based on US and UK practice, I might offer this hypothesis:
The inoculations actually manifest Covid in the jabbed (or greatly increase frequency) in the 10 days or so following uptake; however, prior to third round boosters, because these persons were identified as ‘unvaccinated’ up until 14 days after uptake, there can be a severe distortion in cases/hospitalizations/deaths in the ‘unvaccinated’ population.