The "Ruby Princess" cruise ship provides us with a unique and compelling case study for why the virus was never a real threat to young healthy people. Does anyone know of an in-depth review?
This might be completely meaningless, but presumably, if you’re on a cruise, you’re outside on the deck a lot, soaking in those sun rays and that vitamin D which in turn, gives you a bit of a boost against C19. Maybe early treatments weren’t available, but there was some access to free (be it unknown) remedy.
It would also be worth documenting reasons why this case study is relevant:
- Passenger average age is older than the norm
- None of the younger crew died
- Perfect test case scenario to study infection rates
- The virus was possibly the most virulent it ever was, at that time. It then got milder after each mutation.
This really is the worse possible scenario you can think of:
- Older population
- Completely enclosed and isolated
- At a time when the virus was the most virulent
- With no early treatment administered
-----
Address the hypocrisy of the arguments used to justify the vaccines are safe and effective, when all those arguments can be used to show why the virus was not as dangerous in the first place:
- "Correlation is not causation". Having been on the cruise is not the reason someone caught COVID and possibly died (Especially when they got sick months after disembarking).
- The elderly are more likely to die from the jab because their immune system is not as good. (Seriously!? how can you argue this line of thought and keep a straight face. I have seen people do it.)
- People die all the time of natural causes. Having been jabbed a week prior, is definitely not the cause <sarc>.
-------
If you can think of other logical fallacies please comment.
The Ruby Princess is just another data point proving this whole scamdemic was concocted. CFR, early treatments, asymptomatic spread, everything. We were lied to by a cabal of evil people.
This might be completely meaningless, but presumably, if you’re on a cruise, you’re outside on the deck a lot, soaking in those sun rays and that vitamin D which in turn, gives you a bit of a boost against C19. Maybe early treatments weren’t available, but there was some access to free (be it unknown) remedy.
If you find interesting articles or reports please comment under this post.
I will keep updating this post with references I find:
- Commission report: https://www.dpc.nsw.gov.au/assets/dpc-nsw-gov-au/publications/The-Special-Commission-of-Inquiry-into-the-Ruby-Princess-Listing-1628/Report-of-the-Special-Commission-of-Inquiry-into-the-Ruby-Princess.pdf
- The Ruby Princess Inquiry and International Law: https://law.anu.edu.au/research/essay/covid-19-and-international-law/ruby-princess-inquiry-and-international-law
Just found a full commission report at the bottom of the wikipedia page.
https://www.dpc.nsw.gov.au/assets/dpc-nsw-gov-au/publications/The-Special-Commission-of-Inquiry-into-the-Ruby-Princess-Listing-1628/Report-of-the-Special-Commission-of-Inquiry-into-the-Ruby-Princess.pdf
This is a good start but what I have in mind is a 3-4 page report that just states the facts and stats.
-------
The rationale for the low-risk assessment starting on page 160 is fascinating.
It would also be worth documenting reasons why this case study is relevant:
- Passenger average age is older than the norm
- None of the younger crew died
- Perfect test case scenario to study infection rates
- The virus was possibly the most virulent it ever was, at that time. It then got milder after each mutation.
This really is the worse possible scenario you can think of:
- Older population
- Completely enclosed and isolated
- At a time when the virus was the most virulent
- With no early treatment administered
-----
Address the hypocrisy of the arguments used to justify the vaccines are safe and effective, when all those arguments can be used to show why the virus was not as dangerous in the first place:
- "Correlation is not causation". Having been on the cruise is not the reason someone caught COVID and possibly died (Especially when they got sick months after disembarking).
- The elderly are more likely to die from the jab because their immune system is not as good. (Seriously!? how can you argue this line of thought and keep a straight face. I have seen people do it.)
- People die all the time of natural causes. Having been jabbed a week prior, is definitely not the cause <sarc>.
-------
If you can think of other logical fallacies please comment.
The Ruby Princess is just another data point proving this whole scamdemic was concocted. CFR, early treatments, asymptomatic spread, everything. We were lied to by a cabal of evil people.